首页> 外文OA文献 >OPTimizing IMaging in suspected APpendicitis (OPTIMAP-study): A multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Study Protocol
【2h】

OPTimizing IMaging in suspected APpendicitis (OPTIMAP-study): A multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Study Protocol

机译:在可疑的阑尾炎中对影像进行优化(OPTIMAP-研究):疑似急性阑尾炎患者的MRI的多中心诊断准确性研究。研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, imaging is needed to substantiate the clinical diagnosis. Imaging accuracy of ultrasonography (US) is suboptimal, while the most accurate technique (CT) is associated with cancer related deaths through exposure to ionizing radiation. MRI is a potential replacement, without associated ionizing radiation and no need for contrast medium administration. If MRI is proven to be sufficiently accurate, it could be introduced in the diagnostic pathway of patients with suspected appendicitis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and improving clinical outcomes, without the risk of radiation induced cancer or iodinated contrast medium-related drawbacks. The multicenter OPTIMAP study was designed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis in the general population. Methods / Design Eligible for this study are consecutive patients presenting with clinically suspected appendicitis at the emergency department in six centers. All patients will undergo imaging according to the Dutch guideline for acute appendicitis: initial ultrasonography in all and subsequent CT whenever US does not confirm acute appendicitis. Then MRI is performed in all patients, but the results are not used for patient management. A final diagnosis assigned by an expert panel, based on all available information including 3-months follow-up, except MRI findings, is used as the reference standard in estimating accuracy. We will calculate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and inter-observer agreement of MRI, and aim to include 230 patients. Patient acceptance and total imaging costs will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: If MRI is found to be sufficiently accurate, it could replace CT in some or all patients. This will limit or obviate the ionizing radiation exposure associated risk of cancer induction and contrast medium induced nephropathy with CT, preventing the burden and the direct and indirect costs associated with treatment. Based on the high intrinsic contrast resolution of MRI, one might envision higher accuracy rates for MRI than for CT. If so, MRI could further decrease the number of unnecessary appendectomies and the number of missed appendicitis cases. Trial registration: NTR2148
机译:摘要:背景:在临床怀疑阑尾炎的患者中,需要影像学检查以证实临床诊断。超声检查(US)的成像准确性次优,而最准确的检查技术(CT)与暴露于电离辐射下与癌症相关的死亡有关。 MRI是一种潜在的替代方法,无需相关的电离辐射,也无需使用造影剂。如果证实MRI足够准确,则可以将其引入疑似阑尾炎患者的诊断途径中,从而提高诊断准确性并改善临床结果,而无放射致癌或碘代造影剂相关缺点的风险。多中心OPTIMAP研究旨在评估MRI对一般人群中疑似急性阑尾炎患者的诊断准确性。方法/设计符合研究条件的是六个中心急诊科连续出现临床怀疑为阑尾炎的患者。所有患者均应根据荷兰的急性阑尾炎指南进行影像学检查:所有超声检查均应先行超声检查,一旦美国未确诊为急性阑尾炎,则应行C​​T检查。然后对所有患者进行MRI,但结果未用于患者管理。由专家组根据所有可用信息(包括3个月的随访)(除MRI表现除外)分配的最终诊断将用作评估准确性的参考标准。我们将计算MRI的敏感性,特异性,预测值和观察者之间的一致性,目标是纳入230名患者。还将评估患者的接受程度和总成像费用。讨论:如果发现MRI足够准确,它可以代替部分或全部患者的CT。这将限制或消除电离辐射暴露与CT诱发癌症和造影剂诱发的肾病的风险,从而避免了负担以及与治疗相关的直接和间接费用。基于MRI固有的高对比度分辨率,人们可能会认为MRI的准确率要比CT高。如果这样,MRI可以进一步减少不必要的阑尾切除术的数量和漏诊的阑尾炎病例的数量。试用注册:NTR2148

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号